{"id":1352,"date":"2022-07-11T10:31:36","date_gmt":"2022-07-11T08:31:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=1352"},"modified":"2022-07-11T10:31:36","modified_gmt":"2022-07-11T08:31:36","slug":"that-was-the-week-that-was-04-08-july-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=1352","title":{"rendered":"That Was The Week That Was 04-08 July 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Jesters gotta Jest<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is a wonderful, glorious, history of jesters.&nbsp; They were employed to entertain guests and to keep the mood light.&nbsp; Court Jesters had a secondary role. Their job was to speak truth to power.&nbsp; They all of them knew that to do that, they had to blend that uncomfortable truth in humour.&nbsp; Or as King Lear put it, \u2018jesters do oft prove prophet\u2019.&nbsp; Exactly.&nbsp; Get it wrong and you might lose your head.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But, take it from me, there is a certain amount of skill in wrapping that truth up in something funny.&nbsp; It has to be funny, for a start.&nbsp; Secondly, it is helpful if you can catch the audience unawares.&nbsp; No, not like a jack-in-the-box, but in terms of getting the truth to hit the mark.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the self-appointed court jester to the aviation industry, this week, the week that was, your correspondent is in something of a dilemma.&nbsp; There has been a rash of new jesters taking the stage.&nbsp; Should I welcome the sudden surge in competition in the jestering market, or discourage it?&nbsp; All the world may be a stage, but as Shakespeare knew, you only need one jester per play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I would be tempted to suggest with these Johnny-come-latelies that we have a jester-off, but frankly, I am not sure I would win.&nbsp; It will take first class jester work to top some of what we saw this week.&nbsp; One contender even went all meta, being funny when trying to be serious, instead of the more traditional being serious when trying to be funny.&nbsp; The other refused to wear the costume.&nbsp; You know, the hat, the fancy pants.&nbsp; The form was being played with from the start this week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dressed in disguise, and first out of the blocks this week, was a combined entry from China and Russia, who chose the ICAO High Level Group for a Long-Term Aspirational Goal as its stage.&nbsp; Bet you did not see that coming.&nbsp;&nbsp; Already, it has the makings of great comedy.&nbsp; What would Shakespeare (or his jesters) have done with \u2018long-term aspirational goals?\u2019&nbsp; Sadly, we will now never know.&nbsp; Still, working hard to bring the lols to the High Level Group, you just have to sit back and admire the quality of the jestering in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.icao.int\/Meetings\/HLM-LTAG\/Documents\/HLM.LTAG.WP.09.en.pdf\">this submission<\/a> from China and Russia.&nbsp; Two-handed comedy is hard, but wow, this is quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is important for the jester is to say the truth but make it funny.&nbsp; Tick, tick, tick.&nbsp; Note the truth, which comes early.&nbsp; Paragraph 1.2 in fact.&nbsp; Pow.&nbsp; CORSIA is a failure, and not fit for purpose; incompatible with the Paris goals.&nbsp; Pow; zap.&nbsp; After a start like that, even if disguised, the jester has to bring the laughs.&nbsp; They do not disappoint.&nbsp; Rather than simply stopping there and being all serious, they did the comedy bit.&nbsp; Respect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They were not happy to merely criticise, they put forward a suggestion.&nbsp; Aviation produces about as many emissions as uncontrolled bush and wildfires, the paper notes, so, why not use aeroplanes to put out those fires!&nbsp; Job done!&nbsp; Presumably, the emissions required to fly the aircraft that put out the fires can be factored in by lighting more fires\u2026&nbsp; Think of it as a sort of off-setting.&nbsp; As Shakespeare so very nearly said, put out the fire by putting out the fires.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If China and Russia came along in their suits and turned jester by surprise, the well-known group of aviation jesters (well, never wrong on aviation ever jesters) McKinsey showed up in the traditional costume.&nbsp; We know what we are going to get from their corporate image.&nbsp; But then, they too went meta.&nbsp; Instead of trying to be serious by being funny, they were funny whilst attempting to be serious.&nbsp; Whoa\u2026&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The McKinsey contribution was an article called the \u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/industries\/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure\/our-insights\/the-six-secrets-of-profitable-airlines?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck&amp;hdpid=6b75f7b1-f0f1-4d22-b060-7a8b8d606eee&amp;hctky=12587990&amp;hlkid=ffbf5b70824c4aafb24973d461bfe0ab\">Six Secrets of Profitable Airlines\u2019<\/a>.&nbsp; Hard not to assume that such a thing was serious.&nbsp; But roll out the humour.&nbsp; The secrets, each of them, are well worth the read.&nbsp; You might enjoy knowing that successful airlines work hard on their image.&nbsp; Michael O\u2019Leary would agree.&nbsp; He works hard at Ryanair\u2019s image.&nbsp; Always has.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the winner, the meta-jest of the week, was the one that said that profitable airlines create \u2018pockets of privilege\u2019 with their route network.&nbsp; Right.&nbsp; Newcastle-Wroclaw for example, is such a pocket.&nbsp; There are millions more.&nbsp; Great comedy is a gift that keeps on giving after all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jesters gotta Jest There is a wonderful, glorious, history of jesters.&nbsp; They were employed to entertain guests and to keep the mood light.&nbsp; Court Jesters had a secondary role. Their job was to speak truth to power.&nbsp; They all of them knew that to do that, they had to blend that uncomfortable truth in humour.&nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1352"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1353,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions\/1353"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}