{"id":15,"date":"2009-05-11T11:00:06","date_gmt":"2009-05-11T09:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=15"},"modified":"2009-07-20T11:03:04","modified_gmt":"2009-07-20T09:03:04","slug":"not-everyone-wants-the-slot-freeze-it-seems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=15","title":{"rendered":"Not everyone wants the slot freeze, it seems"},"content":{"rendered":"The legacy carriers fought long and hard to get the winter season slot freeze in place &#8211; perhaps giving up much in return for what may be a one season gain.\u00a0 But now it turns out that not even all the legacy carriers are sure that this is worth it.\r\n\r\nA Japanese airline is now letting it be known that they are adamant that they disagree with this.\u00a0 This is curious, and rather begs the question of why?\u00a0 There might be a few reasons: perhaps the Japanese carriers have become devotees of the free and open market system and the intellectual impurity of the freeze is offence to them.\u00a0 Right.\u00a0 Alternatively, they want to snap up some bargains when slots are left unused.\u00a0 Maybe.\u00a0 Or, there is a fear that the traditional legacy Japanese carriers have lost so much of their clout with the Japanese Dept of Transport and the JCAB (which anyone who has dealt with will know stands for Justifying Considerable Additional Bureaucacy) that they could not guarantee that Japan too might impose the conditions on such a freeze that the Europeans have imposed &#8211; a full review.\r\n\r\nAnswers on a postcard please.","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The legacy carriers fought long and hard to get the winter season slot freeze in place &#8211; perhaps giving up much in return for what may be a one season gain.\u00a0 But now it turns out that not even all the legacy carriers are sure that this is worth it. A Japanese airline is now [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions\/57"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}