{"id":472,"date":"2015-12-04T10:21:34","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T08:21:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=472"},"modified":"2019-07-23T11:47:38","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T09:47:38","slug":"aviation-and-climate-change-where-to-from-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/?p=472","title":{"rendered":"Aviation and climate change: Where to from here?"},"content":{"rendered":"In this, our second article on the role of aviation in climate change, we look at the expected growth in aviation emissions and how the industry plans to limit the impact of these increases.\r\n\r\nWhile the estimates of GHG emissions from aviation discussed in our previous article<\/a> are being widely used in current discussion on climate change, many of these estimates are already 10-15 years out of date. Given that the aviation industry is regarded as one of the fastest-growing polluters, its share of global emissions is now likely even higher. Consider also that since 2000 global GHG emissions have increased by an average of 2.5%<\/a> per year. Even if aviation\u2019s share has remained constant, the actual volume will have increased.\r\n\r\nIt is also worth noting that all the figures discussed so far are global totals, and that aircraft emissions contribute significantly more to climate change in the more mature aviation markets. In the US, currently the largest aviation market and also one of the world\u2019s highest polluters, aviation accounts for 2.2%<\/a> of GHG emissions while in Europe the figure is higher at around 3%<\/a> – more than twice the global rate – and the UK is estimated to derive 6%<\/a> of its total GHG emissions from aviation.\u00a0This is particularly relevant given demand for air travel is expected to increase significantly over the next 20 years as new markets mature.\r\n\r\nAs the negotiations in Paris get underway, it is also worth noting that if GHG emissions from aviation are omitted from global discussions on climate change, any resulting country-specific targets will be skewed in favour of those countries with already mature aviation markets.\r\n\r\nIt is estimated that by 2050, albeit in the worst case, CO2<\/sub> emissions from aviation could account for over 20% <\/a>of the global total. This is not surprising given historic evidence. Between 1990 and 2012, revenue passenger kilometres (a measure of demand for air travel) increased<\/a> from around two billion to over five billion and, as a result, CO2<\/sub> emissions from aviation increased by an estimated 80%<\/a>. Demand for air travel is expected to more than double <\/a>again by as early as 2034.\r\n\r\nIn September, the Air Transport Action Group (ATAG), on behalf of the aviation industry re-pledged<\/a> to cap net CO2<\/sub> emissions from 2020, and to reduce net CO2<\/sub> emissions to half of the 2005 levels by 2050. No mention was made of the other GHGs or pollutants from aviation. Nevertheless, it is clear that they will face an immense challenge if they are to meet this target and given historic evidence, it would not be unreasonable to question how feasible it is. Given that this target is not legally binding, environmentalists are especially worried.\r\n\r\nThere is no guarantee that this voluntary target is challenging enough to enable the industry to escape more binding requirements in Paris. The industry\u2019s representatives will be doing their best to show that they take climate change seriously and the latest version of the draft agreement suggests that they are achieving this.\r\n\r\nAirlines hope to meet their targets partly through a combination of improved fuel efficiency, improvements in operational efficiency, more efficient aircraft, and greater use of sustainable fuels. However, ICAO estimates<\/a> that even with these improvements, CO2<\/sub> emissions are expected to continue to increase beyond 2020, albeit at a slower rate than demand growth.\r\n\r\nIt is inevitable that, if demand for air travel grows as expected, the only way the aviation industry will meet its CO2<\/sub> target is through market-based tools. These are intended to internalise the cost of the external pollution created by economic activity. A market-based solution is the industry\u2019s least-preferred – and most expensive – option. However, ICAO has pledged to implement some sort of global market-based mechanism for the aviation industry by 2020.\r\n\r\nATAG\u2019s proposal is to make up any shortfall in reduction in the industry\u2019s CO2<\/sub> emissions through carbon offsets. This market-based tool will allow airlines to reduce the net impact of their emissions by financing projects that reduce carbon emissions from other sources. This may include reforestation projects or investments to increase the energy efficiency of building.\r\n\r\nHowever, international aviation is currently not subject to the Kyoto Protocol, and the industry is therefore outside the gold standard offsetting process established there: the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is no guarantee the industry\u2019s own mechanism will have the checks and balances present in the CDM.\r\n\r\nAnother option is an emissions trading scheme (ETS), similar to that which currently operates in Europe. This option was ruled out by ATAG on the basis that it would be relatively complex to establish. An ETS would establish an overall cap on total emissions, with each country or industry awarded an emissions credit allowance. These credits can be then traded between those that are able to reduce their emissions below their individual allowance, and those that cannot.\r\n\r\nBoth of these options would enable the aviation industry to continuing expanding. The impact of any market mechanism on prices, and therefore demand and profits, is what weighs most on the aviation industry\u2019s mind. It is vehemently opposed to the alternative and frequently touted market solution of an explicit environmental tax on air travel, in the belief that this would increase the price of airfares substantially.\r\n\r\nThe moral question remains, however, as to whether a mechanism that facilities growth in polluting air travel is the right outcome.\r\n\r\nWhatever the outcome from COP21, the emissions produced by the aviation industry will be increasingly scrutinised in the future and the industry held to greater accountability. However, based on the current draft agreement, aviation will continue to evade international agreements on climate change and mitigation will be very much on its own terms. Will this be enough?","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In this, our second article on the role of aviation in climate change, we look at the expected growth in aviation emissions and how the industry plans to limit the impact of these increases. While the estimates of GHG emissions from aviation discussed in our previous article are being widely used in current discussion on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-change"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=472"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":473,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472\/revisions\/473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aviationadvocacy.aero\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}