Monday, October 5th, 2015
Until recently, the aviation industry has been able to remain largely exempt from climate change targets. Although currently not the most polluting industry, it still accounts for around 2% of CO2 emissions. The industry is therefore continually under fire to reduce its environmental impact, especially given that airline traffic (measured in RPK) is expected to increase by just under 5% per annum over the next 20 years.
Faced with the threat of compulsory targets, the industry is taking voluntary measures to reduce its impact on the environment. A recent open letter signed by the CEOs of Airbus, Boeing, IATA, CANSO and EBAA amongst others has pledged to halve the industries net CO2 emissions by 2050, compared with a 2005 baseline. Given the expected growth in aviation travel, this will be a challenging target.
Of upmost concern to the industry will be how it can reduce its CO2 emissions without increasing fares. Read the rest of this entry »
Friday, September 18th, 2015
ICAO’s pricing guidelines are considered by some to be the final word in airport charges. Discussions of airport charges between airports and airlines (and regulators) often focus on whether they are consistent with ICAO’s pricing guidelines document.
However, a reliance on these guidelines may actually be detrimental to both airports and airlines. Read the rest of this entry »
Tuesday, September 15th, 2015
As we discussed in this month’s Aviation Intelligence Reporter, more needs to be done to address airspace congestion and government-driven initiatives such as SESAR shouldn’t be relied upon to address the issue. Just doing what we are currently doing faster is not a solution.
In Europe, ANSPs are now starting to face financial incentives to improve their on-time performance. As part of the Single European Sky initiative, ANSPS face losing up to 1% of their revenue if they do not meet prescribed targets for en-route delays. They may also receive up to 1% in additional revenue if they exceed these targets.
The question remains, however, as to whether 1% of revenue is a sufficient incentive for ANSPs to make the necessary changes and investments to increase capacity. Read the rest of this entry »
Thursday, September 3rd, 2015
Start as a billionaire and buy an airline.
It’s an old joke that continues to be relevant, even as the industry posts record profits for 2015. It also captures the great anomaly of the airline industry: why do airlines continue to operate despite apparently never making a decent profit?
Economists often talk about the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) as a benchmark for whether a firm’s profits are reasonable. The WACC is a calculation that attempts to capture the risk associated with an investment by estimating how much return potential investors would need to earn on their investment to be willing to invest in that firm, rather than in another firm.
Profits below the WACC are typically seen as evidence that a firm is making insufficient profits. Theory dictates that should this continue, the firm would eventually go out of business.
Yet, according to a 2013 report by IATA, between 2004 and 2011 the airline industry persistently made profits below its WACC. This suggests that either the estimated WACC is wrong, or that investors in airlines are irrational. Read the rest of this entry »
Friday, August 14th, 2015
The decision as to whether to build an additional runway at Heathrow is increasingly likely to a political – rather than an economic – decision. Therefore, the various affected parties have all been busy publically voicing their opinions on the recommendations set out in the Davies Report. And it is all very predictable. Read the rest of this entry »
Tuesday, August 11th, 2015
As we discussed in this month’s Aviation Intelligence Reporter, the European Commission is struggling to find an alternative supplier to Eurocontrol to support the Performance Review Board in its activities. Ironically, Eurocontrol may soon be facing the same type of problem itself. Read the rest of this entry »
Tuesday, July 14th, 2015
The UK Airports Commission recently released its report recommending the development of a new northwest runway at Heathrow to address airport capacity constraints in the South East.
The Commission reached its view after undertaking a cost-benefit analysis of the different options. The benefits were estimated to exceed the costs for all options, but the net benefit was estimated to be highest for the Heathrow northwest runway option.
The report’s analysis is pretty comprehensive – the main report is 342 pages long with various technical reports making up an astonishing 4,470 pages of analysis. However, the report’s findings and recommendation can essentially be explained by a triangle.
Read the rest of this entry »
Friday, July 3rd, 2015
There has been a lot of discussion in the US recently on how to reform the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization (ATO). The ATO has been criticised by many for being inefficient and for failing to modernise. Furthermore, its funding is currently subject to federal approval of the FAA’s budget – a drawn-out and unstable process that places the ATO’s activities at risk.
One popular suggestion is to transform the ATO into a not-for-profit, government-owned organisation that would operate at arms’ length and be funded by user charges. Others have touted NAV Canada’s user-cooperative as a potential model to adopt.
So far there has been little discussion of the idea of a for-profit ATO despite this model being applied elsewhere. UK NATS, Airways New Zealand and Air Services Australia are all for-profit providers of air traffic services.
Read the rest of this entry »
Wednesday, July 1st, 2015
IATA’s communications team has been busy recently.
First there was the fanfare to announce the new Cabin OK initiative at the IATA AGM. This consists of a new guideline for the size of carry-on bags.
A few days later IATA released a clarifying press release. The size specified is not a maximum limit. This is set individually by an airline and there are no plans for an industry standard. It is merely a guideline intended to give passengers reassurance that their baggage will be able to travel with them. In fact, it seems there is no actual guarantee that a passenger would be able to take Cabin OK-approved luggage on-board. Instead, IATA was merely promising that Cabin OK-approved luggage would have priority to remain in the cabin if an aircraft is not able to accommodate a bag for every passenger and if the flight is operated by a participating airline. That’s quite a few caveats and subsequently a rather underwhelming initiative.
Read the rest of this entry »
Friday, June 12th, 2015
ANSPs would have us believe their position as monopoly providers of air traffic services is sacred. Air traffic control is a natural monopoly, so their mantra goes. Not for much longer.
A natural monopoly occurs in an industry where there are high fixed costs. Typically, these are industries which require large investments in infrastructure. This means that it would be costly for multiple firms to operate as each would be required to build its own infrastructure, leading to inefficient duplication. Commonly cited natural monopolies include utilities such as electricity lines or water pipelines.
Air traffic control has traditionally been seen as a natural monopoly due to the large sunk costs associated with radar.
However, technological changes are starting to challenge this view and, increasingly, air traffic services can no longer be defined as a natural monopoly. Read the rest of this entry »